08.01.2025
Instant payments refer to transactions made from one account to another, available 24/7 and completed within 10 seconds. On March 13, 2024 the EU published a regulation (IPR) that will make IP fully available in euro to consumers and businesses in the EU and in EEA countries. By January 9, 2025, banks must ensure they can receive instant payments. In Switzerland, instant payments were launched on 20 August 2024. Around 70 financial institutions are now able to receive and process these payments.
Share article:
Reading time:
Instant payments, also known as SEPA instant credit transfers (SCT Inst), are Euro transfers within the 34 countries of the Single Euro Payments Area. These transactions enable the transfer of funds within 10 seconds – anytime, around the clock and 365 days a year. While instant payments are processed within ten seconds, standard transfers can take one or more days to complete.
At top speed: sanctions screening for instant payments within milliseconds.
To meet the needs of bank customers who have to make funds immediately available to recipients, many banks offer instant payments, but only some of them extend the scope to include incoming payments too.
Payment service providers such as banks, which provide standard credit transfers in euros, are required to offer the service of sending and receiving instant payments in euros.
The charges must not be higher than the charges that apply for standard credit transfers.
Deadlines for implementation:
Under the new rules, PSPs need to verify that the beneficiary’s IBAN and name match in order to alert the payer to possible mistakes or fraud before a transaction is made.
PSPs should periodically, and at least daily, verify whether their Payment Service Users (PSUs) are persons or entities subject to targeted financial restrictive measures, and should no longer apply transaction-based screening in that specific context.
The critical importance of robust customer screening in the era of Instant Payments: Discover more here
The obligation of PSPs to periodically verify their PSUs is related only to persons or entities subject to targeted financial restrictive measures. Other types of restrictive measures adopted in accordance with Article 215 TFEU (Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union) or restrictive measures that are not adopted in accordance with Article 215 TFEU fall outside the scope of that obligation. The obligation of PSPs to periodically verify whether their PSUs are persons or entities subject to targeted financial restrictive measures does not interfere with actions that PSPs should be able to take to comply with EU law on the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing.
Financial institutions operating in multiple countries or regions, decide which payments to examine depending on the regulatory context and their risk appetite. Relevant factors here include the type of payment (domestic vs. international), unusual patterns (e.g. pass-through transactions), transaction value and the payment’s origin/destination (e.g. country/region, recipient type).
Transaction based screening has to be conducted before the payment is executed. But since sanctions lists screening comprises just one part of the payment process, only a limited timeframe – between 500 milliseconds and one second – is available. A window this tight requires efficient IT infrastructure and bringing all available technical solutions into play, such as interface adjustments, storage of hits and clarifications, cache optimisation and workflow and GUI adaptations.
Instant payments align seamlessly with banks’ digitization strategies. However, they bring heightened risks, requiring IT systems capable of split-second decision-making and meticulous preparation. Customer screening and reducing false positives are now more critical than ever.
Banks having rolled out instant payment projects report needing a lead time of around half a year for analyses, bringing various areas on board and clarifying IT infrastructure.
Questions like these are quite likely to come up along the way:
Execution of a real-time transfer requires payment service providers (PSPs) adhering to the same rules, practices, and standards (“Scheme”) to be present on both sides of the transaction. In 2017, the European Payment Council introduced the Single Credit Transfer (SCTInst) Scheme for Euro instant payments within SEPA. Broad participation by PSPs in this scheme is an essential prerequisite for the wide availability of Euro instant payments throughout the EU.
The payments regulator in Switzerland, the Swiss National Bank, has created an obligation for financial institutions to participate in IP:
During the initial phase, the limit is CHF 20.000,–
Swiss instant payments went live on 20 August, 2024, meaning that individuals and companies can initiate account-to-account transactions. Swiss banks are not obligated to offer outgoing instant payments. Unlike the EU regulation, the Swiss regulation does not impose equivalent charges for standard transfers and instant payments.
The Swiss Interbank Clearing (SIC) payment system, operated by SIX on behalf of the Swiss National Bank, connects bank accounts. Technically, SIC is capable of processing real-time payments. However, to make Instant Payments work across the entire payment chain, adjustments are needed in both the operation and organisation of interfaces between banks and SIX. With the launch of the fifth generation of SIC at the end of 2023, SIX laid the foundation for instant payments, similar to the European SEPA Instant Credit Transfer standard.
How is system availability defined?
A 24/7 round-the-clock service year-round, with zero downtime
What is the maximum tolerable response time?
A maximum of 10 seconds, which is extendable to 20 seconds in exceptional circumstances
What does this mean in the context of sanctions screening?
PSPs should periodically, and at least daily, verify whether their PSUs are persons or entities subject to targeted financial restrictive measures, and should no longer apply transaction-based screening in that specific context. However, they must comply with Union law on AML and CFT.
Which data does the sanctions screening check for instant payments?
The sanctions screening checks transaction data, such as IBAN, purpose of use, blocked banks or countries.
What is the difference between screening of standard bank transfers?
The instant payment screening function compares remittance data with sanctions and blacklists and as soon as a “hit” is found, the payment is rejected. Manual clarification, as with a standard bank transfer, is not possible. To keep customer satisfaction high, it becomes even more crucial to reduce false positives via screening of instant payments than with SEPA credit transfers.
What role must an IT system fill in instant payment screening?
Instant payment screening and the need to perform the checking mentioned within 500 milliseconds and no more than a second has a massive impact on the IT infrastructure and requires interface adjustments. The storage of hits and clarifications must also be adapted to the strict time regime and the cache, workflow and GUI all have to be further optimized.
In March 2024 the EU published a regulation that makes instant payments fully available in euros to consumers and businesses in the EU and EEA countries. The new rules came into force on January 9, 2025 for incoming IP.
The Swiss National Bank wants to do all that is needed for instant payment to become the new normal in Switzerland. This required the expansion of the technical infrastructure and the participation of the banks in the new process. Since August 20, 2024, Swiss banks are able to receive instant payments from other Swiss banks. Smaller banks which process less than 500,000 transfers per year have until the end of 2026 to get set up.
For bank-PSPs in non-eurozone member states, the deadline for receiving instant payments is 9 January 2027, sending instant payments 9 July 2027.
Customer screening has taken on new urgency with instant payments. Daily checks of customer data against sanctions lists bring unique challenges. Explore the key challenges banks are tackling in this article.
Customers expect their PSP to provide reliable instant payments. Any disruptions can lead to significant frustration. The challenge lies in finding the right balance between meeting customer expectations and ensuring institutional security.
Explore the key challengesThe role of compliance officers is growing more important – many now even act as strategic advisors to company management. But inflexible compliance systems that lack automation are still holding them back. Fresh thinking is essential.
Download WhitepaperMore and more banks and insurance companies are hitting the buffers when it comes to preventing money laundering – both in terms of personnel and economic efficiency. But there are ways to counteract the dilemma.
Download the whitepaper
