What we particularly appreciate about ACTICO is their focus on finding solutions, their prompt response to questions, and the all-round support that they offer.
Petra Lauber
Project Manager at BayernLB


Trading in financial instruments is subject to strict regulations – and banks and financial service providers are responsible for detecting market manipulation and insider dealing at an early stage. ACTICO supports this task with its software solution MAID (Market and Insider Dealing Detection).
It monitors securities transactions carried out by customers, employees, or a bank’s proprietary trading desk for signs of market manipulation, regulatory breaches, or insider dealing. The monitoring scenarios can be tailored to the specific requirements of each institution. Automated monitoring triggers the necessary clarification and investigation processes.
What do financial institutions monitor when reviewing securities trading activity?
Trade surveillance typically covers several key areas, including employee trading activities (also via third-party bank accounts), the institution’s proprietary trading, client trading behavior, and potential fraud — such as employee-driven schemes like churning.
Why are rules such an important tool for trade surveillance at financial institutions?
Rules evaluate transaction data to identify patterns that may indicate market manipulation or insider dealing. In ACTICO’s software, predefined scenarios are used to automatically monitor transaction data. When an anomaly is detected, the system immediately triggers an alert for the compliance team and initiates a workflow for further investigation.
These rules can be flexibly adapted to meet the specific regulatory requirements and business processes of each financial institution. Any changes take effect immediately — ensuring maximum agility and control in the surveillance process.
Why does trade surveillance depend on a financial institution’s business model?
Every institution has a different risk profile. One of the key challenges in trade surveillance is defining and tailoring rules to align with the institution’s specific business model. For example, a private bank managing large portfolios for a few clients has different monitoring needs than a retail bank serving many clients. Surveillance rules must be calibrated to detect relevant true positives—such as signs of market manipulation, insider trading, or breaches of conduct—while keeping false positives to a minimum. The goal is to protect both clients and institutions without overwhelming compliance teams.
Why is it important that financial service providers establish staff guidelines when monitoring trading in financial instruments?
Establishing clear staff guidelines is essential for reducing the risk of insider trading and managing conflicts of interest. These guidelines set out what employees are permitted to do—and what they must avoid—when trading financial instruments.
To enforce these rules effectively, institutions typically rely on:
Stop, watch, and restricted lists to control access to sensitive securities
Pre-clearance processes, which allow employees to request approval before executing trades
Ongoing monitoring to identify policy violations or suspicious activity
By implementing these measures, financial institutions foster a transparent compliance culture—protecting both employees and the organization from regulatory breaches and reputational harm.
What are the common criteria in trade surveillance for banks and financial institutions?
Trade surveillance rules at most banks focus on detecting anomalies and risks across several key areas:
Comparison of orders and transactions with market behavioor or predefined limit values
Unusual patterns in trading activity
Monitoring the individuals and entities involved in the transaction
Detection of insider activity, especially involving relationship managers or known primary/secondary insiders
Employee trading behaviour, including personal accounts and third-party bank relationships
Cross-checking staff transactions against insider stop lists, watch lists, and restricted lists
Fraud detection, especially misconduct by relationship managers
These focus areas help institutions identify potential risks early and ensure regulatory compliance across all trading activity.
What we particularly appreciate about ACTICO is their focus on finding solutions, their prompt response to questions, and the all-round support that they offer.
Petra Lauber
Project Manager at BayernLB

You may also be interested in:
Blog
Why Financial Sector Employees are Walking a Thin Line with Personal Securities Transactions
Growing regulatory pressure drives banks to strengthen controls on employees’ personal securities trading – aiming to detect anomalies early and prevent insider dealing.
Personal Account Dealings
Financial Institutions/FinTech
Thought Leadership
Digitisation when checking staff’s private share deals
As private stock trading grows, banks must monitor employees’ personal securities transactions. The blog highlights why digitising the duplicates process is now essential.
Personal Account Dealings
Financial Institutions/FinTech
Brochure
Monitoring employee transactions, preventing insider dealing
Software for detecting insider dealing and market manipulation through employee transaction monitoring
Personal Account Dealings
Financial Institutions/FinTech
Newsletter
Regular News and Updates
Decision Management Platform
Compliance
Resources